Greenville College

English 344, British Literature before 1800

Fall Semester, 2004
8:30-9:20 a.m., MWF

Prerequisite:  English 101

Dr. Donna J. Hart
225 Hogue Hall
Office:  664-6805; Home:  664-3863 (Please feel free to call.)
Office Hours: 
1:30 – 3:30 p.m., MWF
Email: 
Donna.Hart@greenville.edu

 

Required Texts:

Gardner, John Champlin.  Grendel.  New York:  Random House, 1989.   ISBN:  0-679-72311-0 

The Longman Anthology of British Literature.  2nd Edition.  Ed. David Damrosch.  Vol. 1A.  New York:  Longman, 2003.  ISBN:  0-321-10667-9

The Longman Anthology of British Literature.  2nd Edition.  Ed. David Damrosch.  Vol. 1B.  New York:  Longman, 2003.  ISBN:  0-321-10578-8

The Longman Anthology of British Literature.  2nd Edition.  Ed. David Damrosch.  Vol. 1C.  New York:  Longman, 2003.  ISBN:  0-321-10668-7

 

Course Objectives:

 This course will enable students to--

  1. develop a working knowledge of British history and literature from approximately AD 500 to 1800.  (IO A 1, 2; ELAO  1, 4, 11, 12; TEO 1)
  2.  name some of the important works and some of the major British authors from 500 to 1800.  (IO A 1,2; ELAO 11; TEO 1)
  3. understand, describe, and compare the characteristics of each major genre represented during this time.  (IO A 1,2; ELAO 10; TEO 1)
  4. identify and discuss the sub-genres within each of the major genres (i.e., for poetry--epic, lyric, elegy, sonnet, etc.).  (IO A 1,2; ELAO 11; TEO 1)
  5. understand, describe, and compare the cultural characteristics of the major literary ages or periods of the time—heroic, courtly, Renaissance, “Metaphysical, etc.  (IO A 1,2 B 4 C8; ELAO  11; TEO 1)
  6. discuss the similarities and differences between various writers and their literary works.  (IO A 1,2; ELAO 1, 10, 11, 12; TEO 1, 5)
  7. know the devices and functions of the literary language employed in those literary modes.  (IO A 1,2 C 8; ELAO 1, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11; TEO 1)
  8. read closely an unfamiliar literary text of varying difficulty with good comprehension of its cultural context, its literary and language techniques, its structural characteristics, and its themes.  (IO A 2 B 5, 6 C 8; ELAO 1, 5; TEO 1, 5 )
  9. value literary analysis, research of secondary sources, and the discussion of ideas as worthy pursuits in and of themselves.  (IO A 1,2 C 8; ELAO 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12; TEO 1, 5, 9)
  10. judge the artistic significance of writings (including both their communication of meaningful human concerns as well as literary merit).  (IO A 2; ELAO 1, 5, 18; TEO 1)
  11. examine and, hopefully, enhance their understanding of, expression of, and hope in their own Christian faith as they listen to other witnesses, some Christian and some not.  (IO A 1,2 C 7, 8, 9; ELAO 1, 18, 19; TEO 11)
  12. find the resonance between humanity as expressed in great literature and their own human condition.  (IO A 1,2 C 7, 9; ELAO 1, 18, 19; TEO 11)

 

Assessment Activities:

  1. Objectives 1 – 12 are assessed through daily, in-class discussion, online Blackboard discussions, quizzes, impromptu in-class essays, short papers, and two essay tests.
  2. Objectives 8 – 10 are assessed through successful completion of a 10 – 15 page research paper on some area of special interest of the student’s own choice.

Additional Information:

For information regarding the College’s—and MY—policies about writing standards, portfolios, and academic honesty (plagiarism), go to the College website at http://www.greenville.edu/academics/aa/assessment/syllabi/texts.shtml#writing .

 

My Basic Assumptions:

This is a course that demands that you demonstrate:

· Perspicacious Reading.

· Articulate Speaking.

· Persuasive Writing.

In regard to prejudices:

 

We all start with a set of presuppositions--Christians do (various varieties of Christians do), Muslims do, Hindus do, the KKK does, the NAACP does, men do, women do, children do. Everything we read, speak, write, or think gets filtered through those presuppositions or prejudices.

I intend to teach this class through the filter of what we at Greenville College call John Wesley's "quadrilateral," partly I suppose, because this is a Free METHODIST institution and partly because such an approach to academics and to life seems BALANCED to me--avoiding extremes, either to the "right" or to the "left."

The "Wesleyan Quadrilateral" suggests that we make judgments based on  REASON, EXPERIENCE, SCRIPTURE, and TRADITION

 

(R.E.S.T. will help you remember them). These are the 4 supports I want you to use

 

  • To read each text I assign.

·To participate in every discussion we share.

· To write every paper you write.

·To edit every one of your classmates' drafts.  

So what do we mean by the elements of this "Wesleyan Quadrilateral”?

To be REASONABLE means that you must objectively consider all the spoken and written evidence. You must be attentive (give your whole attention) to a variety of viewpoints, whether they align with yours or not. Anger, ridicule, ignore(ance)--none of these responses allows you to be attentive or reasonable.

To use your EXPERIENCE means to ask yourself how being what you are (as in my case, a Christian--Southern Baptist turned Free Methodist and married to a Roman Catholic, a white woman, a farm girl, a mother, a remarried divorcee) informs your view of the world. What does your experience of the world tell you that some of your classmates may not know? What does your personal experience with God through Jesus Christ tell you?

To use SCRIPTURE means to consider carefully what God has said through His prophets and apostles. Of course, this means you must really seek to know WHAT HE SAID and not just what a particular denomination (such as the Free Methodist or the Baptist) says He said. It will take your getting back to the Hebrew or Greek and to the context in which it was written.  The Religion Department can help you do that.

To respect TRADITION means that you do not reinvent the wheel. What have the Church Fathers (and Mothers), Catholic and Protestant, said about this issue? What have historians, sociologists, economists, psychologists, teachers--all scholars--said about this issue in the past? What are wise people saying about it now? How do all these voices stand up under the scrutiny of your own reason, experience, and Scripture?

Such an approach calls for your listening to a multitude of voices--your own and others--and sorting through what makes sense to you in the lights of reason, experience, Scripture, and tradition.  As Andrea Lunsford and John Ruszkiewicz, assert, "It is not a tennis match of ideas, one that will yield winners and losers. Rather, we are interested in how we all come to know and to take positions on various issues, how to nurture open and realistic exchanges of ideas" (The Presence of Others xvii). Nonetheless, I agree with John Henry Newman, nineteenth century British theologian and educator, that we listen to all these voices--our own and others--to arrive at "the attainment of truth, which is their common end" (PO 40).

Attendance Policy:

You can best meet the course objectives by attending and participating in class. We cannot share information and views if you are not here. Your education depends not only on your compliance with reading a certain number of pages or turning in a stipulated number of papers; it also depends on the interaction between your voice and others' voices. Thus, I will allot 2 points toward an "attendance grade" for each MWF class session and 3 for each TR session.  So, for example, if we were to meet 3 times a week for 15 weeks, your total possible points would be 90, which would about equal a test grade.  If we were to meet 2 times a week for 15 weeks, your total possible points would still be 90.  Of course, the total will actually be just a bit less than that, because we will dismiss class on some occasions for research, etc.  Whenever you are not in class, you will not earn the points.

 ATHLETES:  All athletes are excused for all games.  See me about your makeup work ahead of time.  Don't expect absences on top of your games; save your absences for your games.

 ***As far as tardiness is concerned, I do not intend to play that game.  If you are repeatedly late, I'll just start counting you absent.

Grading Criteria:

I designate a certain number of points to every assignment I grade, fewer points for daily assignments or quizzes and more points for major papers. Your grade will be based on the percentage you earn of the total number of points possible. The percentages will be as follows: 90% = A; 80% = B; 70% = C; 60% = D; less than 60% = F. Thus, for example, if you earn 8 points out of a possible 10 on a quiz, you have 80%, or a B-.

Your grade for this course depends on your performance on periodic reading quizzes, in-class impromptu essays, Blackboard discussions, expository essays, unit tests (not applicable to ENG 101), and a research paper.

As far as your major essays go, after several readings, I determine a "letter" grade for your paper. This grade reflects

· how it compares with what you might have done with the assignment (in the best of all possible worlds)

· how it compares with an “ideal” performance on the grading matrix (which I will hand out to you)

·  how it compares with the papers completed by your classmates

· how your paper compares to my "Eight C's" of expectations (which I will hand out to you).

Once I decide your letter grade, I assign your paper a number of points to reflect the "percentage" your letter grade represents.

***While I cannot realistically assign a certain percentage worth to your class participation, that factor is always important.

Late Papers:

Papers are due no later than 4:00 p.m. on their deadline date, unless otherwise indicated on the syllabus.

Study Time Expectations:

College students should, realistically, expect to spend two hours outside of class for every hour they spend in class.  Frankly, when you have a test to study for or a research paper to complete, it will take you more time than that.  

 

 

 

Tentative Assignment Schedule:

Week 1 (September 1, 3)—Introduction to the class, syllabus, Blackboard, etc.  Introductory lecture.   Beowulf.

Week 2 (September 6, 8, 10)—BeowulfAssignment:  Find, read, and summarize a critical article on the epic poem.  Look on the Blackboard site, under “Course Information,” for a reminder of the rubric of a summary paper.  Due Monday, September 13.  (25 points)

 

 

Week 3 (September 13, 15, 17)—Grendel Wednesday is All-College Hike; no class.  Assignment:  Email me your tentative research paper topic by Friday afternoon.

Week 4 (September 20, 22, 24)—The Táin Bó Cuailnge and other early Irish literature.   Assignment:  Take-home essay test.  Due Monday, September 27.  (100 points)

Week 5 (September 27, 29; October 1)—The Canterbury Tales.   Look on BB, under “Course Information,” for historical, political, and social background on Chaucer's time.  Assignment:  Email me your working bibliography (MLA style) of at least 10 research paper sources by Friday afternoon.

Week 6 (October 4, 6, 8)—The Canterbury Tales Assignment:  Analyze and synthesize any 3 tales, two from class and one new one, synthesizing their treatment of a selected issue.  Look on BB, under “Course Information,” for instructions in writing a synthesis paper.  Due Monday, October 11.  (75 points) 

Monday is the College’s Fall Break; no class.  MY SON’S GRADUATION FROM MARINE TBS IN QUANTICO, VA, ON OCTOBER 7.  I WILL ATTEND THAT.  So no class on W or F, either.  Work on your paper.

Week 7 (October 11, 13, 15)—Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.  

Week 8 (October 18, 20, 22)—Renaissance sonnets.  Assignment:  Take-home essay testDue Monday, October 25.  (100 points) 

 

Week 9 (October 25, 27, 29)—The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus.   Assignment:  Essay on a subject related to this play.  Due Monday, November 1.  (25 points)  ***This paper and the one from week 11 will substitute for a test.

 

Week 10 (November 1, 3, 5)—Poetry and prose of John Donne.  Assignment:  Email to me the first several pages of your research paper, in which you do a “review of the critical literature” in regard to your topic.

 

Week 11 (November 8, 10, 12)—Poetry of George Herbert, Andrew Marvell.  Assignment:  Find one poem each by Donne, Herbert, and Marvell (other than one we've read in class), each dealing with the same subject.  Analyze how these three poets present the same subject.  Due Monday, November 15.  (75 points) 

 

Week 12 (November 15, 17, 19)—Paradise Lost.

 

 

Week 13 (November 22)—Paradise Lost. THANKSGIVING BREAK. Be safe going and coming. Have a good time with your family! 

 

Week 14 (November 29; December 1, 3)—Diaries of Samuel Pepys and Daniel Defoe.

 

Week 15 (December 6, 8, 10)—The Beggar’s Opera.  Assignment:  Turn in a hard copy of your research paper.  Due by Friday afternoon.  (200 points)

 

Week 16 (December 13)—Assignment:  Take-home essay test.  Due by end of your scheduled exam time.  (150 points)