Dr. David A. Hoag
Dissertation Digest
Evaluation of the Formal Assessment Process of College Presidents
at Liberal Arts Institutions: Three Case Studies
David A. Hoag, B.S., M.S.
A Digest Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate
School of Saint Louis University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
2003
Presidential assessment is a crucial area for boards of trustees.
The recent call by the Association of Governing Boards of Colleges
and Universities (AGB) that the assessment process be inclusive
and conducted by an external consultant needs study and refinement.
Presidents at three liberal arts colleges, who had undergone comprehensive
assessment by an external consultant, were studied to determine
if their performance changed.
A qualitative approach using interviews with selected subjects
gathered answers to the research questions. A protocol of interview
questions guided the researcher as he solicited performance data
from observers of each president’s leadership behavior; those
interviewed (28) included members of the board of trustees, faculty
leadership, the president, and the president’s cabinet of
vice presidents. Each subject had been involved in the previous
assessment of the president. Each president was treated as a separate
case study. In addition to the interviews, data from document analysis
was used to support the findings from interviews.
The principal finding is that in each case study the president
did address the areas needing improvement that was identified in
their initial assessment, and there was improvement in the performance
of the president at each institution. Furthermore, each president
indicated that the assessment was a positive experience for them
and the institution.
Also, while it was not a primary research question, neither the
presidents nor the interviewees believed that the assessment process
reduced the authority or standing of the president. The study determined
that a comprehensive formal assessment conducted by an external
consultant did lead to improvement of the president’s performance.
Last updated: March
5, 2003
|