|
It is my conviction that there are few if any Christian colleges that have clearly identified and articulated what makes them really distinct in the world of American higher education. I believe there are practical, pedagogical, and theological reasons why this sharpened focus is essential. I think Christian colleges can and must discover their genius.
Christian higher education has both intrinsic and instrumental
values. These values should forcefully shape an institution's goals.
The instrumental value means educating students for service.
But more than narrow vocational or disciplinary training, it means
helping students learn to tackle real world problems. This task
requires colleges to help their students go beyond both dilettantism
and esotericism to true integration.
Unfortunately, too many Christian colleges have traditionally pursued integration at the cost of academic quality. Integration
has meant dabbling. But it is equally unfortunate that more recently,
some Christian liberal arts colleges, in understandable reaction, have
swung to the other extreme, pursuing the esoteric research agenda of
their secular counterparts. This has often meant a severe strain on
resources to compete in the same game as those often wealthier
institutions; not to mention the crucial loss of distinctive I alluded
to above.
I believe true integration goes beyond both of these models. It
demands the best disciplinary competence and at the same time a
commitment to bring that competence to bear on real-world problems.
Such problems inevitably integrate multiple disciplines, values and
learning, and theory with practice.
Perhaps even more central to our distinctive mission, the intrinsic
value means helping students become a certain kind of person rather
than just teaching them to do certain kinds of things. This is
education for character
and I believe it requires colleges to help their students go beyond
both dogmatism and skepticism to what I call critical commitment.
Christian colleges will not be content to produce dogmatic graduates
with “all the answers” but who have never risked asking the questions.
Nor should they be content with graduates who have asked all the
questions but like the skeptical products of most secular institutions
have embraced relativism and abandoned hope that there even are
answers.
This means two things. First, Christian education is risky business.
Faculty, students, and parents must understand this. Second, this means
the work of Christian colleges is doubly difficult and must go beyond
both what is normally done in Bible schools and what is done on secular
campuses. Expectations for faculty will also be commensurately higher.
But I believe that given a clearer picture of this distinctive role,
faculty at Christian colleges will take great pride in the task and
will eagerly rise to the challenge.
With clearer vision, Christian liberal arts institutions can be
distinctive by providing faculty and graduates capable of resolving the
thorniest dilemmas facing society and the Christian community.
|